« Poems for Friday: the Approaching Hour | Main | The Rundown: bodies on the highway »

October 25, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Damien

This is perhaps the most important thing I've read this week.

Smibbo

The problem with this idea is the reality of the rich and famous: they only like giving money for good causes if they will be fawned over for their opinion. TED's main appeal is that by its exclusivity it gives a feeling of relevance and validity to those who engage. As if merely being in a room with someone who has a great idea somehow magically makes you an innovative person by osmosis.

My personal beef with TED is that they really seem to love the whole "Impossible Dream" notion: that a person can do anything if they just believe enough. I've watched enough people talk about physical disability as if it were a mental construct to be completely disenchanted with the TEDsters. The last straw was the famous runner who talked ad nauseum about how we have to stop thinking of disabled people as disabled. Because she's got super-special artificial legs therefore she's not REALLY disabled. Naturally that means all disabled people aren't REALLY disabled, its just society labelling them that way. I'm sure blind people will be happy to find this out. Not to mention all the spinal cord injury people.

Martin Ramsey

David,

I think this idea has some legs. However, the participation shouldn't be limited to those who have thousands of dollars of expendable income. That qualifier will indubitably narrow the ideas, debate and solutions to which money would be applied. Five donors giving ten thousand or five thousand giving fifty bucks a piece?
The donors/voters being more affluent would incline them to see 'worthwhile' solutions to social problems within the norms which produced their privilege and not likely encourage independent thoughts and ideas. Just a thought.

Martin

David Forbes

I don't disagree, Martin, the specifics of the current NoCon proposal (like the $2,000 limit) were intended as a mirror to the hypocrisy of TED-style conferences.

martin

Right on, let's do it! Let's get specific, you have a platform to get this thing going. I've talked with a number of people about this idea. What can be done? What will it look like?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

The Breaking Time explores the politics, culture and possibilities of our fractured era.